Category Archives: Random thoughts – keeping you on your toes

Life is change

My friends and family have directly experienced a number of life changing events over the last couple of months, for myself the impacts have been somewhat indirect but still part of my life.

This got me thinking about how life is a constant series of changes – the frequency and impact varies, but the change never stops.

Change is Good

A long time ago I added “change is good” to my set of personal values.  The concept resonated with me and it felt like a good fit with my other values and personal philosophy.

With the frequency of changes occurring around me recently I started to think about my change value in a slightly different context.

Perhaps intuitively I realized change is inevitable.   Given it’s constant and all around us,  embracing the changes and going with the flows will result in much more positive results. (Sort of, why fight it you won’t win anyway?)

Even those things that have negative emotions associated with them are going to occur and need to be worked through.

Ultimately, my personal acceptance of change( that is any change), as being good because things need to change lays a foundation for acceptance.  I am the one who chooses how I deal with changes, and also I have a personal accountability to do so, changes cannot just be ignored.

Where would we be without change

The other aspect of this value about embracing change is the recognition that life is all about change.  Without changes, what is the point of living.  Things occur, some happen to us and some we make happen but all of these things form the reason to live.

Maybe a simple answer to the deep philosophical  question “Why am I here?”   is basically to both experience and embrace ongoing change.

Blame it on Fred

It never ceases to amaze me how fast people can assign blame to others.  Throwing others under the bus can be a useful technique to avoiding consequences.  Not surprisingly though, tossing another under the bus is used frequently as an avoidance technique – not just to avoid blame or consequences.

Fictional Fred

The Fred of this posts title is totally fictional – the phrase has a nice ring though.  The point is when assigned blame it does not need to be real, you just need to make it stick elsewhere.  This is a very common and unfortunately, too often, an effective technique.

Acknowledge and Accept

It is my experience that clearly accepting responsibility for a fault or at least acknowledging the issue without blame or bypassing excuses is the most effective way to drive to resolution.

Ignoring the blame story or your excuses is a most natural reaction for the those to whom you are explaining yourself.  The fact is throwing others under the bus, deflecting the blame or making excuses just does not work effectively.  When you try it most people just hear “blah, blah, blah ……”  And ultimately you might not receive any consequences and could deflect the assignment of work but believe me you are not getting any confidence points.

I have never seen a positive reaction to the statement “it’s not my fault”.  Maybe some sympathetic lip service but the fact is most people don’t care.

Even if you are not directly responsible and there are reasonable and factual explanations acknowledging the issue and committing to work to resolve it is almost always the best approach.

And if that does not work, blame it on Fred.

Accountability, Power and Consequences

In the workplace all human resources have three key attributes associated with the work they do and how they get it done.  These apply to all your colleagues regardless of where you or they are in the organizational hierarchy.

Understanding these attributes and how they apply to the people working in your organization can be a key tool for you to use when practicing leadership skills without the benefit of positional or consequential power.  That is “leading from behind”

Accountability

The context here is not just the areas and tasks which someone is specifically assigned but rather how they approach and handle accountability.    Do they readily accept it, avoid it,  or delegate it?

Does accountability drive their behavior or does it have little impact on what and they do their work.  In fact some resources in some organizations have been known to do little or no work by cleverly avoiding accountability (and so accepting the associated responsibility).

As a leader seeking to work with these individuals, understanding where they fit really helps with motivation.

Power

The simplest  definition for power is the ability to get others to do things.  This can be through granted power (the organization says you are the boss and those below you in the organization need to take your direction.)  Or this can be through earned power – others take the direction because they respect you, owe you, want to do it or have some other ulterior motive to follow your direction.\

As a leader, not needing organization power is key.  How the power is acquired is not the critical component, rather using it effectively

Consequences

These fall into two broad categories:

  • internal consequences, that is things that bother you and drive your behavior.  Largely these are based on your personal values.
  • external consequences – physical or mental punishment meted out by someone else

Leaders exhibit strong personal values that drive their own consequences but when using their leadership behaviors it’s important to understand what works best with others.

Using Leadership Behaviors

The most effective and long lasting way to work with others toward a goal, or to influence the processes and practices within an organization is through the use of earned power.   The key leadership skills (i.e., confidence, self awareness, ability to communicate clearly, clear personal values that engender trust and respect) are the baseline for enabling the use of earned power.

Of these skills, self awareness includes the  understanding of how others are reacting to you and considering where a person falls within the three attributes of accountability, power and consequence can really help with this.

Leading from Behind

The concept of using leadership behaviors out of the spotlight (leading from behind) to influence others to breakout their own leadership behaviors (the leader within) are not new, nor am I the originator of these ideas.

I do, however, really buy into these concepts.  Most of us can name a historical figure that represents our concept of a great leader, but that does not mean well known leaders are the only great leaders.

Leaders don’t need to be in front of their followers

Let us define leadership as a specific set of behaviors, which results in great achievement.  Achievements which are not possible to attain by normal behavior.

“Lead from behind” is a very cool concept because it is more about facilitating success by providing the framework for a group of people to behave as leaders.   A critical mass of leadership behavior is achieved and becomes a powerful force of positive change/achievement.

Consider American Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s

Martin Luther King is often named as a historical figure and a key leader of the black civil rights movement.  The reality is Mr. King was a catalyst for hundreds of leaders who were not in fact following Mr. King but leaping ahead of him.

Names like Claudette Colvin, Aurelia Browder, Susie McDonald, Mary Louise Smith and Rosa Parks all are good examples of this.  Their actions strongly contributed to the changes in civil rights laws as they pertained to black people, and their actions are founded on key leadership behaviors (things like knowing the objective, self awareness, confidence, and so on).

Leading from behind Martin Luther King acted as a catalyst for these leaders as well as thousands of others.

The Gandhi Example

One of my favorite stories about leading from behind is true story about Gandhi.   During the campaign for Indian independence, Gandhi left the middle of a press conference in mid question.  The reporters were asking about his views on the peaceful separation of India from England.  As a large demonstration passed the press hall, with signs praising Gandhi,  he stood and stated, excuse me I need to go and catch up with my followers.

It’s not about you

A key take away from this concept of leadership is that it is not about you.  Strong effective leaders recognize the power lies with others, the leader is only the catalyst.

Buy and Hold

As the equity investment market in Canada is in strong decline as of late I am doing a few posts on investing concepts.  I strongly recommend you follow the series in sequence.  I started Sunday with some high level concepts and focused yesterday on equity investing.

Don’t need the capital, hold!

The object of investing is  to provide fuel for the economy while making some money for yourself.  Invested funds are used to produce products or services which are paid for with money which is used by the producer to pay wages, produce more product and services, return money to investors and buy other stuff.  This in turn puts more money in the economy and everything spirals up.

When you provide capital to fuel the economy, as noted yesterday, even if the investment drops in value (unrealized loss) as long as you don’t need the capital back you can hang on until you have an unrealized gain.  You could then sell and realize the gain or not and just continue to hold the investment.

Why would you do this?

The intent of investing is to make money.  This can be from dividend/interest payments or capital gains.  The goal is to have optimal returns and if you can grow your funds through all all three ways (dividend, interest, capital gains) of course this is a good idea.

That being said, if you buy the investment and get a solid steady continuous  return with little risk without fooling around with the capital by just gathering income, than why not.

And the Point

These days of doom and gloom, the media is screaming about the economic downturn and capital losses in the equity markets (among other bad things).  The reality is, if you don’t sell your capital investment you don’t lose anything.

In fact, a possible but exaggerated example might be the case where you invested $1 million in a bunch of blue chip stocks with dividends of 10% or $100,000 a year.  From today, the capital value of the stocks might drop to $500,000 (don’t sell yet so not actual loss) and five years from now it might be $2 million.  If you hold the investment for 5 years you will earn $500,000 in dividends and then $1 million in capital gains (if you sell at that point, I would probably still hold).

All just because you held on.

The Caveats

Of course if the company stops paying a dividend or goes bankrupt you will ultimately lose.  The thing to consider though, is how likely is this for blue chip stocks (it does happen but not often) and if it does there are probably more problems – big companies collapsing can’t be good all around.

And the final word is, obviously if you are leveraged (owe money) or have an unexpected need for the capital then this approach does not work.

If you can follow the buy and hold approach, though it is not guaranteed the likelihood of  a reasonable reward is a decent possibility.

 

The value vanishing act

As the equity investment market in Canada is in strong decline as of late I am doing a few posts on investing concepts.  I strongly recommend you follow the series in sequence.  I started yesterday with some high level concepts.

Disappearing Value

In the case of equity investments you are actually purchasing a piece of paper, that is a stock certificate; which indicates how many stock you purchased and that they are registered to you.  (In today’s world your broker usually keeps the registration record on your behalf  electronically and actual certificates are not issued. The stock is technically shown on the company books as held by the “street name” of the broker.   You are known as the beneficial owner.)

The point is, when you buy the stock what you are actually buying is a piece of paper  (or electronic record) saying you have some ownership on the issuing company.

As an owner you are entitled to dividends (a fixed amount returned to the owners on a fixed frequency) if the company’s board of directors decides to pay them (they don’t have to).

If the demand for the stock rises and others want to buy it you can sell your piece of paper for more than you paid for it.  The difference between what you paid and what you received is a capital gain.

If the demand drops, but you need to sell your stock (piece of paper) and get the money out for other purposes you might sell it for less than you paid.  The difference between what you paid and what you received is a capital loss.

Unrealized Capital Losses and Gains

The stock market your stock is listed on (for example Toronto Stock Exchange) will list the offered buy and sell prices throughout the business day as well as actual buy and sell transactions that occurred.  You can use the offered selling price or the actual end of day closing sale price to determine if your stock is worth more or less than you paid.  Until you actually sell your stock this difference is called an unrealized loss or gain.

Focus on Income or Capital Gains?

If the stock is paying a dividend and you don’t need the capital (what you originally paid for it) for other purposes  the unrealized loss or gain is irrelevant.  The income keeps rolling in (unless the board votes to stop paying a dividend)

NOTE: Some equity investments can pay the income in interest rather than dividends – more details on why it is interest rather than a dividend will be in future blogs)

If however you bought a stock which does not pay dividend or interest income because you were planning to make a profit by realizing capital gains the current state of the market where thedemand for stock is dropping, your situation is more tricky.

So the capital value of your investment might be vanishing, and it might not matter due to the fixed income or if you need the capital and have to sell that is not good, a loss will be realized.

Mostly equity investors combine capital and income to achieve overall gains but leaning toward one approach over the other can be more appealing to an investor depending on their objectives and risk appetite.

More on this topic tomorrow.

Where does all the money go?

The last couple of weeks the media have been on a glorified dance of doom and gloom about the economy.  This is a message that catches attention and so is step number one to a good story which leads to readership and associated revenue (whatever the revenue model is).

Some will argue the media goal is to share information objectively to keep the public informed, and while in some cases that might be true I believe profit is still an underlying objective (cynical me).

Economic Downturn Impacts

Investing to drive economic growth comes in a variety of flavors. Simplistically there are two classifications for investments:

– low risk investments which typically have a define fixed rate of return (fixed income) and often are “guaranteed”.  These are typically things like Corporate Bonds, Government Bonds, Guaranteed Investment Certificates, Bank Accounts.

– higher risk which usually are intended to achieve a greater return could result in not only no return but even loss of the original investment.  The most common of these is equity type investment and can include stocks, funds, options, commodities.

High Risk Investments and the Economy

At the summary level, monetary investment is a key way to drive economic growth.   Money is invested to enable more production (whether a physical product or service).

The increased production leads to increased profit which is returned to the investor.  Basically this is a key goal of investing.

As time goes by, if revenue and profit in the target investment continue, the return on investment continues.

So what happens when money is invested and production does not continue to increase or even worse declines?

Where does the money go?

Usually the low risk investments are not effected, it would require a long, deep and traumatic downturn like the world wide depression of the 1930’s to impact them.  This is not the case for the higher risk types.

For equity investments, when the economy climbs the monetary value of the investment rises and when the return drys up the monetary value of the investments drops.   So when the economy is in a downturn, profits drop or even worse turn to loses and so does the investment value.

Since the increase in the equity of the investment is based on demand the higher value just appeared – that is more money was not printed nor did the investment itself change so the increased amount of money someone would pay for your investment is just perceived worth.

The same is applies for the underlying income supporting the investment (for example the profit the company you invested in dried up).  The profit just disappeared, but the amount of money in the economy did not really change.

So in the economic downturn the monetary value of the investment disappears, but since it never really existed in the first place – did it really?

The answer to where does the money go is simply, it never existed in the first place so it did not need to go anywhere.

Disclaimer – This is a very complex topic for which only some basic concepts are commented on here, in future posts I will continue to build and explore this topic.

Learning from History – Not

I am an avid reader of books.  I prefer fiction although and often treat reading non-fiction as focused education, useful but a bit of work.

When reading non-fiction I am usually am trying to understand a topic better and build my subject matter expertise while I treat fiction as more of a relaxing activity (that is not to say you don’t learn stuff from fictional stories, just in a different way)

Fabulous Christmas Gift

I received a copy of “The Devil in the White City” for Christmas.  It is a non-fiction history of the Chicago world’s fair and one of America’s first serial killers.

This is the best non-fiction work I have ever read.   While it is not a historical novel but rather a history (so – non fiction) it is written in the style of a novel.  The book is meticulously researched, full of quotes with clear citations listed at the end of the book.

 What about the Environment

“The Devil in the White City” covers a lot of ground giving a strong visual picture of the world as it was in the the 1890’s.

While the history includes a a multitude of fascinating information and facts, a particular quote from Daniel Burnham, Director of Works, World’s Columbian Exposition, 1893 (aka Chicago World’s Fair) really caught my attention.  Unfortunately it is as true a statement today as it was back then:

“Up to our time, strict economy in the use of natural resources has not been practiced, but it must be henceforth unless we are immoral enough to impair conditions in which our children are to live”.

As capable as the human race is over 120 years have passed since Mr. Burnham made this statement and sadly I am not sure we get it.

Life Long Learning

Learning comes in many forms from the formal, to just straight up experiential.  Everyone is exposed to some form of learning moments  throughout  their lives, for many I would argue there is a daily chance for a learning experience.

Whether we absorb, store and ultimately how we use the learning we are exposed to (if we use it at all) is unique to each individual.   Some not only learn, but share what they have learned (teaching).

Formal Learning

Formal learning. which usually includes some form of validation (testing) and often provides recognition (things like a certificate, professional qualification, post secondary degree, license to practice, etc) is valued and the teacher(s) are frequently paid for providing the learning service.

Formal learning comes in a variety of formats from one on one teaching to classroom or online courses  and a plethora of variations and is sometime confused as the main and perhaps only way to “learn”

Informal Learning/ Take Care to be Aware

Keen observation and awareness of our surroundings and paying attention to each interaction we incur through out our day is key to attaining benefit from all the informal learning opportunities that come your way each day.

What did that communication you just received really mean?  The actions you just observed created a result, is there an identifiable root cause?  Is it repeatable?

The more we let these learning experiences pass us by the more we miss out the opportunity to build our knowledge and capabilities.

Youth as learning sponges

When we are young the questions typically come fast and furious.  This is just typical human behavior, these questions are learning moments.

As time goes by (and we grow older) the questions are less frequent and even sometimes discouraged or treated as socially unacceptable.   How often have you heard “enough, no more questions, just do it?”

Both the learning moments and knowledge sharing chances require patience – on everyone’s part.

Take Advantage

Consider the value and benefit to your own happiness from embracing the opportunity to make a key aspect of your life about life long learning, leveraging every chances you get both formal and informal.  Don’t let life pass you by.

The Schengen Agreement

I have long been a believer the citizens of earth should be allowed free access to anywhere in the world.  This is not to say no countries or borders, just free movement across borders.

What about Culture?

As currently configured, laws customs and cultures around the world have a geographic specificity and national pride which is often a key underpinning for the support, maintenance  and promotion of the these concepts.  Often this is constrained by the boundaries of the country.

It is interesting to note though that languages and customs (the culture) can cross national boundaries and spread common practices and beliefs, as defined by regional commonalities, ultimately these cultural practices encompass multiple countries.

Most commonly the cultural, legal and economic practices are applied within a countries borders and the border is the clearly defined boundary which, when crossed, leads defines the change to your personal behavioral rights and restrictions.   That is you need to respect the laws of the country you have just entered.

None of this would be imperiled by having free access across borders.  In fact it is probably enhanced.

Why do these artificial constraints exist?

Is there a value to defining ownership of a country (albeit ownership by the population living there through their proxy leadership).  This includes deciding who can enter (and in some cases even who can leave) and how they can behave (the law of the land).

The only value I can think of is to the power hungry dictatorial (or elected) leaders who need territory to define their self worth.

Consider the Schengen agreement which covers a number of  European area countries.   The agreement was initially struck in 1985 and has grown since then to the point where today  free movement is allowed through all the twenty-six participating countries.  No border checks (imagine)

People are still expected to be able to identify themselves if challenged and to follow the rules the country they are in (countries still exist even with free borders – imagine).  The big thing is there is no border check to pass when either entering or leaving.

And it works.  Why have other countries around the world not embraced this advanced liberal practice?  Probably fear is the biggest driver.  Fear terrorists will have free rein, unwanted hoards will come to your country and ruin it,  your citizens will be overwhelmed.   You power diminished.

A Challenge

To national leaders around the globe, take a look a the approach adopted under the Schengen Agreement – it works, people love it and the world is a better place for it.