Tag Archives: morality

But is it Right?

During my corporate career, I encountered a number of different approaches to defining and implementing a code of ethical conduct.  That is the moral principles that govern a person’s organizational behavior.

Without exception, these were always founded on the expectation every individual member of the corporate family acted with honesty founded on strong moral principles.

Rules versus Common

Rule-based ethical practices are very popular but I have always had doubts about the effectiveness of this approach.  Behaving with integrity is not absolute and definitely is impacted by both context and personal perspective.

I believe the best organizational code of conduct I ever encountered began with a simple dissertation on the qualities of ethical behavior.

It was neither directive or specific as to what was correct or incorrect relative to carrying out your assigned responsibilities. The key to the code was the simple ending.

Question Yourself

Notwithstanding the high-level guidance employees could read in the document, in the end, all were simply directed to ask themselves, “But, is it right?” after considering all the contextual aspects and before committing to action.

After all, acting ethically is not a simple nor straightforward behavior.  It requires consideration of all the factors, and most importantly the application of common sense.

The intent of questioning yourself is obviously not to cause analysis paralysis, some things just don’t have an easy answer, nor is it intended to create a personal dilemma.

Check Comfortability Rating

Rather asking yourself “But is it right?” is simply a reasonability check.  Take time before committing yourself to action to really ensure you feel comfortable about what you are about to do.

The Collective Conscience

We can display our individual conscientiousness through conformity to what we consider to be correct, right, or morally good. Our social or cultural norms should be key influencing factors.

The collective conscience is displayed when all members of a social group practice consistent behaviors.  That is everyone accepts and conforms to the beliefs of the whole relative to what is right.

Laws/ Consequences

Voluntary adherence to societal norms is ideal.   History has shown while the majority of the population complies with cultural expectations a small percentage requires more motivation.

Hence our construction of laws with associated penalties or consequences of some sort.   These consequences can range from a slap of the hand to death.

Pandemic Context

A serious topic on everyone’s mind of late is the rapidly spreading Covid 19 illness.  Caused by the Corona virus, which seems to be easily and readily spread efforts toward containment require adherence to the collective conscience.

That is we need to isolate ourselves from others rigorously and respect each other’s space.   In North America, we are relying on personal integrity for adherence.

Stories from China and starting to emerge from Italy indicate a more forceful lockdown is taking place as some just don’t consider the need to adhere based on their own personal conscience.

We are seeming a lot of this behavior throughout the U.S. as well.  I find it puzzling given the requested self-isolation is only for the good of all.

Do we really need to be forced to do what only makes common sense?   I guess for some, sadly, that is the case.

 

Masters of Reality

Manipulation of the truth can alter your reality.  Those that morph the truth make their perspectives matter.  They can overcome logic and common sense.

You may be unduly influenced by these so-called masters of reality and need to guard against overt levels of influence in order to retain your personal perspective and identity

Influence or Manipulation

All of us tend to attempt to elicit change in others’ perspectives (on and off) together with their associated behaviors, typically to our benefit.  This practice of exerting control can be considered natural and reasonable behavior, or not depending on intent.

Influence occurs when we openly have an effect on the character, development, or behavior of someone or something.  Manipulation is the exerting of control on a person or situation cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously.

Integrity

Those of us with strong personal values, being honest and having strong moral principles can sometimes be at a disadvantage relative to those that don’t.

If honest, moral behavior which conforms to cultural norms is not high on your list of personal values it becomes easier for you to manipulate others in that manipulative behavior typically requires some level of moral suspension.

Being of good character with high personal standards does not mean you need to be a target for the manipulators but it does require you to be on greater guard to identify when someone is playing politics for their own gain.

It is important, from a self preservation perspective to guard against those that seek control through manipulation.

The Leadership has Spoken

I had a interesting discussion about ethics at lunch today.  I was not alone, so this post is not about me talking to myself but actually dialoguing with others.

Follow the Leader

Often in our societies its the government that provides (dictates?) our morality and thus the associated ethical behaviour.   The crusades goal of recapturing Jerusalem was obviously moral and ethical (obvious to the leaders and their pions).

Conclusion, murdering others is a moral and ethical behaviour if the cause is just.  Justice as defined subjectively by the leader and accepted by their followers (pawns?)

Really!!!!

My wife does not agree with this assessment.  Perhaps the winners of a conflict will position themselves as moral practioners of ethical behaviour but this is in fact just self justification. War is wrong!

Checking in with the Greeks

Plato postulated, at it’s core,  human nature was based on three main objectives:

  • seeking knowledge
  • seeking power (victory/reputation)
  • seeking wealth (money, material gain)

By there very nature the practice of these behaviours clouds humans abilities to define morals in a consistent and sustainable way.

We each have a different mix  of beliefs underpinned by our very natures.  That is our individual  drive for knowledge, power, and material gain.

There are of course infinitesimal ways these attributes can be weighted.

The Result

Murder is morally wrong, my ex colleague opined at lunch today.  At least we can agree on that.  My counter is “except in self defense or pursuit of a just cause”

And so the slippery slope of morality and ethical behaviour begins.  Is it within the realm of human beings to solve this difficult question definatively.

I like Plato’s answer,  in essence he said, we can seek to define and achieve morality but we will never attain that goal.  The three fundemental aspects of human behaviour make it impossible.

Disclaimer

The aforementioned  philosophical discussion about plato and comments from my lunch companions and wife are my interpretations and may not accurately reflect their feedback.

But is it Ethical

The definition of ethical behaviour is very open to interpretation.  That is  applying the principles of morality to determine right or wrong behavioural conduct (so called ethical behaviour) can be somewhat subjective.

What is moral behaviour?

In simplistic terms I would argue moral behaviour is the practice of good works through selfless actions.  Of course this raises the question what is good?  Also what is selfless.

Considering my life is all about me, selfless must be a behaviour I embrace within the context of my self.  (That is I decide what is selfless behaviour not the observer).  Thus selfless behaviour is highly subjective.

External Influences

My conclusion is, if the practice of ethical behaviour is entirely based on your own subjective assessment it is truly of little value.  In truth it must reflect your knowledge/understanding of social and cultural norms.

Still subjective, (ultimately you are the one doing the interpreting) but at least now there is a bar or baseline to validate and measure against which is not entirely about you.

The ethical behavior arising from this moral understanding will then be governed by rules or standards for right conduct or practices influenced and directed by societal norms.

Typically these rules are refered to as laws, professional standards or common cultural beliefs with such universal acceptance they are labled as behavioural norms.

Were it so Simply

Logically then, we should all be able to operate within a common moral context leading to consistent ethical behaviour.  NOT!!!

Rationalization and selective interpretation are virtually impossible to banish.  And so, our own believe system (and it is as individual as we are) is a key inflencer to our moral understanding and thus the associated ethical behaviour.

So isthat  just the way it is?  Do we throw up our hands and give up?Can we do something to make it better? As a society are we doing something to make it better?

Stay tuned, more musings on this topic tommorow.

Integrity

The level at which we each practice personal integrity, that is the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles, can be subjective and hard to measure.

We each invision what ” a person of good character” means within the context of our personal filters. That being said, there are accepted commonalities that define moral behavior across your geographic culture or even the human race in general.

For example thou shalt not murder a fellow human is a mostly universal belief across regions, races and religions.

It is the interpretation, recognition and acceptance of exceptions to this moral principle that create the dilemmas (i.e., except when a war is going on or it is enforcing a law or singular belief, and so on)

Practicing Personal Integrity

From an integrity perspective, our personal behaviour should be able to consistently allow us to answer yes to these simple questions:

  • Is it right?
  • Is  it fair?
  • Would others (a majority) answer yes to those questions?

This is a simple self “litmus” test you can perform, before acting, to help you set and the follow  your own morale compass (don’t overlook question 3 as it is the zinger.)

Rules, Laws and other Constraints

Society creates boundaries, both tangible and intangible, often governed by consequences as a way of standardizing behaviour to meet the cultures minimum requirements.

While adherence to these more detailed and sometimes restrictive rules cannot be ignored, just following these standards does not equal high integrity.

My basic test of three questions can be a great assistance to your confidence levels as you try and choose behaviours that could be held to a high moral standard.