Category Archives: Random thoughts – keeping you on your toes

Why hike the mountain when the valley beckons.

Choosing the easy way to your objective seems intuitive.  Yet, so often, I observe people taking the senic or well known path, even if it is not the most effective choice.

For example the direct route may be the path more traveled but if it goes over the mountain a more circuitous route through the valley could be an easier journey, even if it appears longer at first blush

Considering Options

The real message of this post is a recommendation to think before you leap.  The best path might not be the obvious one.  Reducing your effort on one task could well make time available for others.

Unless you are bored and the objective is to fill the empty void of time as it stretches on and on, the most efficient approach is usually best.

But how to do it?

The easy way is not always obvious, most often though an easier alternative exists.

On my drive to work each day, the shortest path goes thru a very busy intersection.  This is the way most people go. Stop and go.  Wait for a light.  Wait for another light, and another.

I take a slightly longer route, easy flowing no stop and go and maybe 5 minutes longer in duration.  However, it is a much more pleasent drive,  Using the easy route, I arrive at the university relaxed and ready to enjoy.

This alternate route required some research to uncover, but it was worth it.

 

Don’t worry, be happy

In the 1980’s, Bobby McFerrin had a huge hit single titled “Don’t worry, be happy”.  While I don’t believe lack of worry equates to happiness, there definitely is some relationship.

In my own view worry is one of the easiest emotions to deal with.  For things you can control, there is no need to worry – you are in control and will be able to ensure a satisfactory outcome.

For the things you can’t control, there is no need to worry – there is nothing you can do about it to change the outcome so why worry.

In essence everything falls into one of those categories.  Either you are in control or you are not.  Therefore the reality of things is there is nothing to worry about.

Then why do I still worry about stuff

The key to making this philosophy work is categorization.  For example if you are worried about making an appointment on time; start with the premise you control the time of your arrival.  Plan your trip to the appointment (you contol this) so you will be on time. No worries.

On  the way you have car trouble.  You are going to be late.  The car trouble was out of your control, so don’t fret it.   You have a cell phone and can call the person you are meeting, so do it – don’t worry it.

If you don’t have anyway of contacting the person you are meeting, it is out of your control so why worry.  There is nothing you can do.

Try it

You may have some doubts that this approach can resolve all your worries.  My recommendation is give it a try.  You may be surprised.  Probably there is little to lose and peace of mind to gain.

 

Because I can

Sometimes things we do to give us pleasure have no obvious purpose beyond giving a sense of satisfaction.  When asked why, I often respond “Because I can!”

For Example

For multimedia viewing I have set up a playstation, boxi-box, raspberry pi, apple tv, dnla server, qnap media centre and a chromecast.  All of these devices do essentially the same thing, albeit the configuration and specific functional details differ.

I also have four wi-fi subnets, three routers and powerline networking.  I admit it is overkill.  Basically the functional capabilities of my home network far exceed my needs.

In the tablet space, I have both full and small size IOS and android  tablets.

On a recent trip, the security officer at airport security made me take my tablets out for separate inspection (usually this only applies to laptops).  I thinks she was puzzled why someone would travel with three tablets (ultimately they serve the same function).

And my only explanation is because I can.  I have the time, the skills and of course, find it interesting.

Really

This is a bit of a simplistic explanation.  Even I can see  It is a stretch to believe the only motivation is the ability to undertake the task.  There must also be some interest or desire.

The really puzzling piece for me though is fact is the redundancy.  Once you have one media centre what is the value of multiple devices.

I think  the pleasure in surmounting the challenge of getting it to work, (i.e. proving I can) is the real answer here.  Basically what these things do is of less importance to me than getting them to do it.

Like the mountain climber, I do it because it’s there and I can.

 

Taking Action

Taking personal accountability is a theme that runs through my posts. I am a strong believer in this behavior.  I believe it helps me act consistently within the context of my values.

As well, it is a great underpinning to an optimistic viewpoint.  All of us see things we think are inappropriate, inefficient or for one reason or another just annoy us.

So fix it

Taking personal action to resolve the issue, rather than complaining or blaming others is a core concept of personal accountability.  It is all about you  ( another of my pet philosophies) so you need to take action.

I am not suggesting we personally execute whatever needs to be done to resolve the problem; your action could just be influential, structured to help create a specific outcome.  One that leads to resolution but is executed by others.

Feels Good!

In my experience taking personal control always feels better than complaining or blaming.  Additionally in working to resolve the issue you become part of the solution.

Behaving this way also helps you maintain an optimistic attitude.  As you act and things improve it becomes clear you can make things better.  You can help find solutions and solve problems.

Give it a try

So the next time you come across something that bothers you, pause and reflect on what you can do about it.  Focus on you, not them.  Others may be associated with the root cause, others may be at fault; forget that.  You can fix it, so do it.

Using Values to guide your behaviour

I had an interesting discussion today about the value of personal values.

Personal values are your internal conception of what is good, beneficial, important, useful, beautiful, desirable, constructive, etc. In essence the values are used by you to guide your behavior.

Behaving Consistently

In any given moment how you react/ behave depends on a myriad of factors both external and internal to yourself.  A strong personal value system simply provides a support guideline to help ensure the internal factors coincide with your conception of what is good.

It is actually quite easy for the external influences to override your logic and cause you to behave in a way you don’t really want to and under less stressful circumstances, would not.

Although it is certainly not a fool proof method, by adopting a simple set of values, which are easy to remember and understand you will have a fall back to assist in behaving the way you want to.

An Example

“If I say I will, then I will”   This value statement falls within the category of Integrity.  It is simple, easy to understand and follow.

Let’s say you told a friend you would meet them at 2:00 pm on a Saturday at a coffee shop downtown.  Between the time you made the commitment and the time of the appointment your circumstances changed and you no longer want to meet.

Your personal value dictates you will arrive at the appointment (unless alternate arrangements are mutually agreed).  To the person with this value, a promise is a promise.

Keep it simple

With a small and clearly defined set of values (I have four) you can help guide a significant amount of your behavior.

Back to the discussion that prompted this post, my view was the person with the internal guidance support provided by simple, easily followed values will most often be perceived to have the best behavior.   That is on an overall macro basis.

This does not mean they would never have bad behavior, just the chance their behavior will generally meet their conception of good will occur more often.

On the whole this will improve their interaction with others and visa verse

 

Accountability without authority

I stumbled onto one of my pet peeves today.  Accountability for achievement of a goal was assigned to an individual who does not have the authority needed to execute.

Authority can be granted or earned or a combination of these.  In most cases achieving success requires some exercise of authority.

Consider a grocery store cashier.  These days mostly they are authorized to accept cash,credit or debit in payment for the goods being purchased.

If a check is offered they cannot accept it, although they are accountable for completing the purchase transaction, this would be a case where they do not have enough authority to personally complete the task for which they are accountable.

In this example, the cashier would escalate to a manager for a decision thereby facilitating transaction completion.   The authority level is clearly defined as is the the operational procedure for exceptions.

My Pet Peeve

My issue is around those cases where accountabilty is assigned without any authority.  The expectation is the accountable individual will somehow be able to earn and exercise the authority needed.

This does pose the real danger though of contravening organizational expectations around the level of an individuals empowerment.  This could be a problem for the individual, the organization or both.

Avoiding the issue

Organizational leaders have the capability to resolve this issue by defining empowerment and authority boundaries (clearly documented) as well as ensuring checks and balances are in place to ensure they are not abused.

No one should be given accountability for a task for which the authority parameters (whether earned or granted) are not sufficient to get the task completed.

Family Ties

One of my younger brothers got married last week.  My own immediate family, my brothers and sister with their families and a number of my cousins attended.

It was a fabulous celebration, as well (for me any way), a family reunion of sorts.

The event got me thinking about family ties.  In essence “family ties” are a way of describing a type of interpersonal relationships.  That is a group of people you know; like friends, colleagues and so on.

Whats Different?

The key attribute to family relationships is some kind of bloodline association.  The more direct the “blood” tie, the closer the relationship.

The exception to this would be family relationships created through marriage (so no direct bloodline).  This can expand your family grouping to people without a direct connection to your genes.

As your family grows, through birth and marriage many become separated by physical distances but the defined ties, (marriage or bloodline) usually remain strong.

As a result, an occasional gathering of the clan (so to speak) from near and far can be a lot of fun.

Given the family relationships are defined by blood or marriage you don’t get to choose your immediate family (except your spouse) so sometimes these gatherings can have some friction.

Fortunately, for both for my immediate and extended family there are no obvious rifts.  Everbody gets along (largely) and overall it seems we genuinely like each other.

As a result our accidental reunion was a lot of fun.  Thanks bro.

 

 

 

Acronyms and Jargon

I am currently reading “The Prisoner of Guantanamo” .  while it is a fictional account, the author was a reporter turned novelist and I have found his previous books to be quite accurate.

At the beginning of the tale there is a three page section dedicated to the jargon and acronyms of the Guantanamo Bay naval base and prison.

One Language is not enough

I started to wonder about the adequacy of the English language.  Clearly it either not descriptive enough , too complex or hard to pronounce.

The solution appears to be just to create language addendums (jargon) and shorten phrases and things to the first letter only (nouns).

All of this creates an advantage for those who know the terminology.    They understand the conversation while another might not until familiarity sets in.  Until all are fluent those in the know have some power over the others.

Is there a value to “org” speak.

Having organizational or even family specific jargon can speed information exchanges but often at the risk of decreased clarity.  Jargon is often vague (intentionally so).  It sounds cool but often actually means little.

For example, I love the phrase “I’m on it”.  Often used to convey the message that the task is underway.   What task, what objective and when will it be done are not part of this message, but it sounds good.

Crisp, clean seems to have meaning.

Plain English

While jargon and acronyms are used extensively, I alway question the purpose.  Is this for communication or power? (I understand stuff you don’t).

For me, sticking to plain English is the method of choice.

 

Getting in the groove

For musicians the expression “getting into the groove” signifies a comfortable pace just they hit their stride in a song.  It is a good feeling and the kind the player would love to sustain.

A examplar story of this comes from the recording of the song “Can’t You Hear Me Knocking”

This was the 11th American studio album recorded by the Rolling Stones, released in 1971.  This is in my personal top five albums of all time and “Can’t You Hear Me Knocking” is the standout song for me.

You can feel the groove

The song clocks in at a little over seven minutes long.  It was written as a three minute tune but at four minutes in, Mick Taylor, the Stones lead guitarist at the time, just picks of the groove and solo’s to the end.

Glyn Johns, the engineer, just let the tape keep running.  You can hear Mick is inspired, in the groove and just can’t stop.  It is both absorbing and infectuous for the listener.

Getting your groove on

When you can, whether it is playing music, a game or whatever activity has you absorbed when the opportunity arises to get your groove on, go with the flow – it feels good.

Accountability Impacts

Whether at home, work place or within a social organization the effective exercise of accountability is critical.  Lack of defined accountability results in frustration and it’s associated social baggage (anger, despair,  angst, withdrawal, etc)

Defining Accountability

Personal accountability is the willingness to be answerable for outcomes resulting from your choices behavior and actions (I paraphrased this from material I found on the internet.  It is not a direct quote but shortened and summarized a bit).

Collaberative Accountability – shared responsibilities across team members, teams or groups.  High performing teams exhibit the ability to practice joint accountability.  The three musketeers motto is a great example of this.  “One for all and all for one”.

Organizational Accountability – whether the organization is your home, association or workplace the defined leadership structure must include clearly defined accountabilities together with the associated levels of empowerment to exercise them. That is, who does what, when and how vigorously.

Anarchy Reigns

Without some type of accountability (one, two or all of the types noted) the right things don’t get done, except by accident.  The risk of failure is high and paricipants in such situations tend to bail.

I have heard arguments around the value of anarchy, as both a philisophical and political practice but, like communisum, I am not aware of any practicle applications.

Conceptually, maybe although I even question if some of the stated benefits I have heard bandied about anarchic societies are at all real.

So if you have any opportunity to influence or impact (for the better) the level of practice and or effectiveness of personal, collaberative or organizational accountability behaviors within your sphere of operations – do it.  You will be thankful you did.