Tag Archives: free will

Nature versus Nurture

Each of us has some traits genetically programmed.   These influence our behavior.

Additionally, from the day we are borne our behaviors are influenced by the things that happen around us, our environment.

Nature vs. Nurture ?

It is clear our genes define our basic being from physical body structure to the workings of our internal organs – nervous system, brain, heart liver, blood, etc.   The resulting behavior  is said to be derived from nature.

Our speech patterns, values, morals  and the associated behaviors become formed over time by the external influences around us.  Things like economic circumstances, climate, friends, family and so on.  The resulting behavior is said to be derived from nurture.

A key question for human behaviorists is how do nature and nurture factors influence each other.  Do these two main drivers work in conjunction, does one supplement the other or are they independent?

Are certain behaviors more impacted by one or the other of these factors.  For example are  values more derived from environmental circumstances or are you borne with them?

Twins

To help answer these questions a large number of studies have been conducted using identical twins separated at birth.  These subjects are great examples of identical genetic templates subjected to different environmental influences.

The most definitive conclusion from numerous studies to date is that a combination of nature and nurture drive the end state and neither nature nor nurture can be held up as the unique and only reason for a specific behavior.  That is to say, you could be borne with the potential for great intelligence but not exercise it fully due to your environmental situation or just the opposite, regardless of environment the intelligence potential could be realized and practiced.  It has not been possible to identify a single definitive cause (nature or nurture) that consistently associates with a particular result.

Free Will!

The good news from these studies so far is that the concept of free will is supported.  If you are a regular reader of these posts you would know I am a big believer in free will and constantly encouraging all to exercise theirs.

If nature or nurture cannot be consistently associated with a resulting behavior than it is intuitive that some level of free will must exist allowing, us to make our own choices dependent neither on nature nor nurture but just us.   This is what is means to be human.

Free Will

I had a conversation today that got me thinking about free will.  What is it, how do you exercise it and how is it different from personal accountability and being total free, topics I wrote a post about on Aug 24th.

The discussion that set me off was about a hypothetical case where a man entered a crowded auditorium, walked to center stage, dropped his pants  and defecated.   This was a conversation opener  as an extreme example of free will.  My initial response was if someone dressed up as batman, entered a crowded movie theater and shot several people dead is that an exercise of free will?

Respect Others!

Obviously society has placed constraints on behavior.  Killing others clearly does not fly as an expression of free will in any society around the world (although consequences of such expressions of “free will” vary depending on where, why, etc).  Defecating could be construed as a political act and might pass society’s muster.  This would depend on a number of things and in North America we use the legal system to help manage these decisions.

The concept of free will though is as bit different from the philosophy of total freedom I explored in my previous post (although related).   We do control how we think but personal accountability and societal constraints impact how we can express our free will within the context of those we live with.

What about seat belt laws?

In most provinces in Canada we are not free to travel in a car without wearing a seat-belt.  Of course we could express our free will and not wear the seat belt, taking the risk of consequences (probably a fine, maybe death).  The interesting question is whether a society has the right to impose on it’s members constraints like the requirement to wear a seat belt when traveling in a car  (The right to limit the act of murdering others seems pretty obvious, but forcing people to wear seat belts?)

Practicing Free Will – RULE OF THUMB

On Aug 13th I captured a basic  personal philosophy in my blog post Aspire Against All Odds  and I believe it is worth repeating in the context of this discussion.  The best way to determine how to practice free will could be as simple as the following:

I will live my life to maximize my personal pleasure as long as I don’t impede on the personal pleasure of others.