Tag Archives: bureaucracy

Making it Better

Post-secondary education in Alberta is heavily reliant on government funding.  The current provincial government has studied funding levels in other Canadian jurisdictions and concluded the public cost of post-secondary education in Alberta is too high.

The conclusion is supported by the cost analysis of selected universities and colleges across Canada.   The result is a significant reduction in Alberta government financial support of post-secondary institutions.

Accept and Resolve

Resistance to the cuts, while a natural reaction is both probably futile but also the question arises, “Is it the best approach?”  Perhaps reducing costs could lead to greater efficiency and quality.

There is undoubtedly a human cost mostly due to a reduction in well-compensated jobs with a good personal work-life balance.   This job reduction does not need to reduce the quality or effectiveness of education services.

In reality, the layers which develop in large organizations over time often result in a costly bureaucracy that is both less efficient and produces lower quality than a more streamlined organization.

More with Less

Efficiency experts, largely now termed business process analysts have for years demonstrated the principle of better results from eliminating a bloated cost base of human resources.

Doing fewer things does not equate to poorer results.  I have personally experienced this truth on numerous occasions.

Initially,  I was extremely skeptical but over time, my own observations have led to the conclusion expense reductions often do lead to improved quality of operations and surprisingly increased revenue.

Spending Gets Results (Not Always)

Spending is necessary to achieve results.  People need to be fairly paid for their efforts.  However, more people and more cost will often reduce effectiveness and quality, the right balance is critical, more does not automatically equal better.

Too much Government.

What is the optimal level of government involement in our lives?  Consider a jurisdiction where individuals lived as and how they like.  Ideally laws would not be needed provided individual behaviours were self governed not to negatively impact others.  The government could focus on common infrastructure everyone used, roads, power, water etc.

In this ideal state (which is probably as practical as communisum) lawyers and courts would not be needed as everyone would self govern and conflicts resolved through consensus.

Moving to the other side of the balance beam a central authority (i.e., government) would manage both infrastructure and social interraction.   This would extend not only to behaviour laws but also intervention in commerce (the economy).

My utopian situation is somewhat like that described by Any Rand in her novel Atlas Shrugged.  The opposite exaggeration described here is alarmingly close to the current state of governance in Canada.

Focus on the Few

As Canada appoaches a federal election I am singularly dissapointed at the focus by all contenders on small constituencies as opposed to the population as a whole.  As the promises become more targeted to specific groups both the complexity and cost rise.

While it may seem positive to the few that benefit, for the country as a whole this is a detrimental approach.

This brings me back to the basic premise of this post,  too much involvement by governments in  day to day behaviours ultimately will lead to bad results.

In Canada,  it is time to swing the control and involvement pendulum the other way.