Tag Archives: free trade

Canada vs. U.S., who loses fastest

The U.S. has initiated a trade war with Canada.  This has resulted in a massive amount of commentary which I absorb with great interest,  yet in my opinion the real question is rarely mentioned.

The questions around what, how, why and who are somewhat irrelevant but whatever  your perspective about those fundamentals is, the one absolute truth is that everyone loses, period.

Americans and Canadians alike will suffer and neither will be better off than at the start of the trade wars.  Perhaps if a declaration of victory is needed it will be the country that recovers fastest with the smallest long term effects.

Not even about who loses the most

This conflict is not about who loses (everybody does) but rather which country is negatively impacted the fastest to an extent where the pain becomes intolerable.

Like a game of chicken with two automobiles headed for a dead on collision, with no one swerving, the winner after the crash is the combatant witch the least injuries and most importantly is best positioned for recovery.

Popular Support

The US polls show support of the tariff policy at less than 30% while 75% of Canadians support their government actions.  These poll numbers support the theory that America will reach a level of intolerance (i.e., declare a crash) far before Canad,  unless something unexpected occurs..

When and how the trade wars end is unpredictable but it is likely the current American President will declare victory regardless of the circumstances.

After all he has declared victory over Iran numerous times to date although that conflict does not really seem to be over yet.

In the End

The victor will have continued employment growth, rising GDP, strong trade agreements worldwide and recognition their approach was successful.  At the moment my opinion is that will be Canada hands down.

 

 

Free Trade

Picture a planet where the human race exchanges raw materials, products and services without restriction.  This senario puts all product and service suppliers on equal footing.

In this idealized situation wherever you were on the earth the price or cost of goods would be limited by natural attributes.  At the simplest level access is based on availability and demand.

Competition would be founded on the producers abilities without constraints of artificial controls like tarrifs, duties and other types of border controls.

And the Con’s

National identity requires differentiation.  A way for the population to say “My country is better than yours.   Managing your national identity requires  control over outsiders.

Our nations exist so we can collaberate jointly to support the overall populace through leadership (governance) and laws.  Setting boundaries is a key aspect of this.

Each countries internal economy and national culture tend to be unique in some ways.  Open borders make it more difficult to maintain this singularity.

At what Cost?

Freely exchanging goods and services around the world will probably increase access and lower costs.  This would ultimately improve world wide economic activity.

The insular approach lowers creativity and can result in stagnation.  Japan of the seventeeth and eighteenth century is a very real example of this.

The country was virtually closed to foriegn influences and as a result  national development and creativity stalled.

Ultimately the human race would probably benefit greatly by thinking outside of the box.  Blow away artificial limitations and be free.