The protests in Hong Kong, which were triggered by a proposed extradition agreement with China, have continued for months and there is no apparent end in sight.

Allowing the general population to influence change through freedom of expression is one of the greatest privileges any social group can be granted.

It is saddening to me when the privilege is abused.  However, that said, determining if freedom of expression is being abused is a subjective measure at best.

Managing Unrest

The Hong Kong protests raise a very important question in my mind.  How much force is acceptable to prevent violence, looting, and property damage?

In this case, the Hong Kong protesters argue the police are overly abusive.  Beyond the original purpose of the protest to change the proposed extradition changes, now the rationale is often cited as a demand to end police brutality.

From the perspective of the police and governing officials,  lawlessness should be punished, albeit according to reasonable standards.  Does violence by the protestors justify violence in return by the police?

When Civil Unrest is Not Civil

One definition of civil is showing good manners and being polite.  The other meaning refers to something related to citizens (the general population).

When civilians are not civil the authorities can feel obligated to react.  The results are usually disturbing and no one really wins.  Unfortunately the Hong Kong protestors did not stop when they made their point.

What comes next could be very unfortunate.  Civil disobedience can only go so far before it lead to violence and pain.